Tag: young adult

Can Hush, Hush please be quiet?

Can Hush, Hush please be quiet?

☆☆☆☆☆

(0 stars)

Obviously, I’ve been on an angel reading spree this summer- yet if you’d asked me before to place my bets, I wouldn’t have thought Hush, Hush to be the worst of them all. I’ve been eyeing para-ro angel books since they were first published, but my dislike of the genre has always outweighed my interest in angels- so coming into them now is fairly interesting.

Anyways, Hush is atrociously bad. This is ‘you would not believe’ levels of bad going on here. Folks, we have headscratching angel mythos, smart-as-stone heroines, girl-hate, abusive love interests, and a villain who is one hundred percent correct. Settle on down to this boat of terror and place your arms under the bar- it’s a real doozy.

Continue reading “Can Hush, Hush please be quiet?”

The Kingdom: A fantastical, dystopic, nightmare

The Kingdom: A fantastical, dystopic, nightmare

★★★★★

(5 stars)

I very rarely buy physical copies of books. New, at least- one reason for my spurges of bad YA recently has been because those are the easiest books to find thrift. Good books, especially new good books, rarely show up in charity shops. However, I went ahead and paid full price for The Kingdom without reading any reviews, and I’m glad I did.

I knew I would like this, but that doesn’t mean I wasn’t pleasantly surprised how much I did. My favorite movie is Ex Machina, and one of my favorite books is Only Ever Yours, and this book is a perfect blend of both, but also set in a theme park. And books set in theme parks are the best books.

Plainly, I would recommend this book to anyone (and already have). It’s a good length suspense about the meaning of being alive, AI, morality, and advanced technologies, and the only major downside to me was the ending, which seems to set up more for a possible sequel rather than embrace a clean, tidy ending.

Continue reading “The Kingdom: A fantastical, dystopic, nightmare”

Abandon represents a fun- yet troubling- genre mix-up

Abandon represents a fun- yet troubling- genre mix-up

★★★☆☆

(3 stars)

The author of the book is for once very important to this review: Meg Cabot! I’ve never read anything by her, but I know the name, and realizing she’d written this generic-looking para-ro book gave me pause. She wrote the Princess Diaries, a series which became a movie which I have seen heaps of nostalgia for and love. Without ever touching any of her contemporary teen-tween girl books I knew she was known for humor, lightness, fun, and quirky narration.

So what was she doing writing Abandon? This book screams para-ro boom of the early 2010s, from design to title to plot, yet is met in the middle by Cabot’s signature style. In the mix of an ugly love interest and his fairly abusive actions is genuinely funny dialogue. Despite the insta-love romance, there are bits of satisfying, true emotional moments regarding coming of age and being a teen girl. Even with the confusing, cartoon-ish bits, there’s real wit and good writing shining through.

Like, maybe I just liked this because I’d just finished a particularly bad quartet, but the writing is so good I found myself not caring as much as I should have about how bad the romance was. I liked the voice too much. Plus, it’s a short and snappy read.

Continue reading “Abandon represents a fun- yet troubling- genre mix-up”

YA literature can do worse than The Beholder… so at least there’s that

YA literature can do worse than The Beholder… so at least there’s that

★★★☆☆

(3 stars)

This (The Beholder, Anna Bright) is not a book I would have ever picked up, but I got it in a book crate and felt I ought to give it a go. It’s…. well, it’s not very exciting, and there isn’t a ton to talk about. I don’t hate it or have much to dislike, and generally enjoyed reading it, but it’s also not very engaging (or plot focused). The world building is a wonderful idea, but the execution is at times head scratching.

Continue reading “YA literature can do worse than The Beholder… so at least there’s that”

Sweet Reckoning means Sweet Release from me having to read this horrifying series

Sweet Reckoning means Sweet Release from me having to read this horrifying series

☆☆☆☆☆

(0 stars)

Is ‘horrifying’ the right word? I typed ‘horrible’ at first, but then… this book, and the series as a whole, is so absurdly bad it sounds fake. How else can I discuss a book  with extreme christian themes and yet super horniness, where the bible saves the day, the love interest is a canonical child rapist, and panty-sniffing virginity-sensing demons are a key plot point?

There’s actually a fourth book, a companion to the trilogy from the viewpoint of the love interest, but right now I don’t have interest in reading it.

Continue reading “Sweet Reckoning means Sweet Release from me having to read this horrifying series”

I know we wanted a Nikolai duology, but King of Scars isn’t it

I know we wanted a Nikolai duology, but King of Scars isn’t it

★★★☆☆

(3 stars)

King of Scars, for the uninitiated, is the latest in the ever growing Grishaverse- at this point three series and a short story collection, both linked and not. This is not a book you can read without familiarity to the world- both the original Shadow and Bone trilogy and at least the first book of Six of Crows. As the other two stood relatively separate, this book represents the first real crossover between the two different tone/writing series, and the first book to mark a real ‘epic fantasy saga’ stepstone in the Grishaverse. SaB and SoC both can stand without the other and wrap up their storylines, while this is far closer to a sequel: book 6 of the saga, if you will.

It’s written to have it’s own plot, but there’s few new characters or concepts, and the entire story, while with a degree of separation, is based on conflicts and plot points of the past. To someone with an imperfect memory of SaB and who only read the first SoC, I understood the plot points that came up- but only because of narrative reminders. This book is officially drenched in lore.

This is all my set up. Here’s my short before the proper review: King of Scars was one I was solidly looking forward too. I had a crush on Nikolai from the SaB trilogy, and I’m pretty sure I even wrote Bardugo a fan letter back in the day declaring Nikolai should forever remain single, so I had a chance of marrying him. Anyways. Fan favorite Nikolai is back in this duology, but he’s just a different person, the plot isn’t that centered on him, and the story jumps the shark entirely by the halfway point. This book is too long, with a messy story and some fraught character choices, but picks up by the end and still contains plenty of enjoyable moments and characters. It’s imperfect, and to a degree frustrating as someone who was looking forward to it quite a lot.

Continue reading “I know we wanted a Nikolai duology, but King of Scars isn’t it”

Entangled’s just a lackluster TV drama in book form

Entangled’s just a lackluster TV drama in book form

☆☆☆☆☆

(.5 stars)

Thrift store pick up and one day read. It was wrongly placed in horror/paranormal section so I was anticipating that. It’s not fantasy at all, nor is it really crime/suspense- the framing device of her stuck in a white room with nothing to do but write is interesting, but ultimately irrelevant to the story and not at all the focus.

To quickly sum it up: Grace wakes up in a white room with a locked door, looked after by a boy she met the night she tried to kill herself. She starts from the beginning, as there’s nothing to do in this room but write- basically, a ‘I’m sure you’re wondering how I ended up in this situation’ set-up. Grace is depressed and mentally ill and not at all being treated for it, though not in an unreliable narrator way. The story is mostly about her difficult relationship with her one friend Sal, and her new boyfriend Nat.

Continue reading “Entangled’s just a lackluster TV drama in book form”